Such complex and varied emotional responses all contribute to reluctance by the majority to formally report domestic violence. The ABS Personal Safety Survey estimated that 80 per cent of women and 95 per cent of men had never reported an incident of violence by a current partner to police and 58 per cent of women and 80 per cent of men who experienced violence committed by a previous partner had never reported it to the police.
Some said that they were reluctant to approach the police, but would have if they had felt that police would be more understanding. While most do not report incidences of domestic violence to the authorities, many seek advice or support from family members, friends or community services. In the case of violence committed by a former partner, 93 per cent of women had told someone about it. Given that the majority are often prepared to discuss domestic violence in an informal or community setting, experts in the field suggest that it is unsurprising that those affected often prefer to seek support, not from the criminal justice system, but from elsewhere in the community where their experiences will be understood and validated by a friend or a community services professional who understands the complexities of domestic violence.
In summary, domestic violence reporting rates to the authorities are very low, but the majority of those affected eventually discuss the violence or the controlling behaviour with someone in the community. Given that psychological responses to domestic violence can be complex, experts in the field argue that proactive support services focusing on therapeutic emotional and psychological interventions may be more effective in encouraging disclosure and providing assistance than the criminal justice system that focuses on an incident and the appropriate punishment.
Although a criminal justice response may be necessary or preferable in many cases, perhaps better coordination and integration between community support and police services, together with a radical change in focus from punitive to non-judgemental, transformative responses and interventions more generally, might encourage higher reporting rates. It is argued that this is important since a lack of reporting results in a lack of consequences for offenders. A wide variety of strategies have been employed to tackle domestic violence in Australia and internationally. These include:.
The evidence for the effectiveness of any one class of programs is mixed, partly at least due to methodological difficulties with measuring effectiveness. None of these strategies alone has been definitively demonstrated to be the most effective way to stop domestic violence, and it seems likely that some combination of all of these approaches is necessary to make a difference.
A public health approach to preventing domestic violence classifies preventative strategies into primary, secondary and tertiary strategy, although the differences between the levels are not always clear-cut. Primary prevention strategies aim to prevent domestic violence before it begins, whereas secondary prevention is focused on at-risk populations and tertiary prevention aims to prevent reoccurrence of violence after it has occurred.
These are:. Perhaps the highest profile community attitude campaign operating in Australia targeting domestic violence is the White Ribbon campaign. A researcher provides a concise explanation of the logic behind domestic violence primary prevention strategies targeting men:. We will only make progress in preventing violence against women if we can change the attitudes, identities, and relations among some men, which sustain violence.
To stop the physical and sexual assault of women and girls, we must erode the cultural and collective supports for violence found among many men and boys and replace them with norms of consent, sexual respect, and gender equality, and we must foster just and respectful gender relations in relationships, families, and communities. While some men are part of the problem, all men are part of the solution. There appears to be little in the way of independent evaluation of the success of the White Ribbon campaign in reducing levels of domestic violence; however this tends to be true of primary prevention programs targeting violence generally.
One common approach taken for is to target programs at young people, particularly school students. The primary prevention of domestic violence programs targeted at students typically adopt a feminist-based approach and emphasise the role of power and control and gender norms in domestic violence. Evaluations of the effectiveness of school-based respectful relationships programs are often equivocal. A systematic review by US-based researchers published in examined 11 studies of primary prevention programs for domestic violence targeting school students. The researchers found that there were some promising results; however the studies were generally of poor quality with short follow-up periods and lack of assessments of relevant behaviour.
Even where the evaluations were more thorough, there remained questions about why the programs worked or whether the results were likely to also apply to other similar programs. The effectiveness of relationships education programs in Australia has also been uneven. There has been an increased focus on respectful relationship programs in the last five years in Australia.
Between and , the Australian Government invested in 32 one-off Respectful Relationships projects across three funding rounds in school and non-school settings. Only some states and territories currently teach this aspect of the Australian Curriculum, so while all state and territory government school curricula currently include some level of relationship education, there continues to be variation.
These announcements illustrate a desire to improve community attitudes on violence against women. As outlined above, recent Australian surveys on attitudes towards violence against women have found that the majority of Australians do not endorse attitudes supportive of violence against women. Half of the respondents, however, believed that women fabricate cases of domestic violence to assist them in family law cases, and that young people, and particularly young men, were more likely to endorse attitudes supportive of violence.
There are two main approaches to intervention programs which usually take the form of group programs that target perpetrators:. In recent years there have been a number of literature reviews and meta-analyses studies that collate large numbers of similar studies to increase the statistical power of the analysis of domestic violence perpetrator programs. The evaluation of these programs is complicated by the variety of different program approaches and the lack of high quality research.
In general, the research has found that there is little difference between the effectiveness of psychoeducational and cognitive behavioural interventions. Most of the research on these programs has been undertaken in the United States, and there is little work on how applicable the results of the research might be to the effectiveness of similar programs run in an Australian context. A review of evaluations of Australian sex offender treatment programs, which share many features with cognitive behavioural approaches to domestic violence, found small reductions in re-offending in most of the programs.
However, most evaluations did not use control groups groups of offenders who did not receive the treatment for the purposes of comparison , and were therefore unable to demonstrate that it was the program that caused the reduction in offending. While evaluations tend to find that men who complete interventions programs often have lower levels of recidivism, drop-out rates are very high. Systematic evaluations have found few rigorous studies of perpetrator programs that reported significant positive results.
What you can do at work to stop the violence in our homes
Overseas studies that have looked at perpetrator programs combined with other interventions such as substance abuse programs or couples therapy have been inconclusive. Studies have tended to find that, in terms of effectiveness, men who were older, more educated, and more likely to be employed are more likely to complete programs.
Men who are younger and have a history of alcohol or substance abuse are most likely to re-offend. While perpetrator programs play an obvious role in preventing domestic violence, they only address one aspect of the broader issue of domestic violence. Questions arise as to how best to ensure that the men who need these programs get referred to them, and that the women who are abused by these men have access to appropriate services.
This has led to the development of integrated approaches, which encompass the responses of police, courts and social services to preventing and stopping domestic violence. Integrated responses offer clear benefits for service delivery to victims, including—importantly for this Inquiry—improving the experience of victims involved in multiple proceedings across different legal frameworks. Another benefit is that such responses enable networks to be formed across services and government departments at a local level, fostering collaboration and communication between key players in different legal frameworks, and providing ongoing improvements to practice and understanding.
The model, developed in Minnesota, is based on a strong interagency approach closely linked to the judicial system, whereby the ongoing safety of victims is given paramount importance. It takes account of research demonstrating that women may continue in relationships with abusive partners because of a lack of economic resources, social support networks, and low self-efficacy amongst other factors The focus of the Duluth model is thus much broader than just intervention with offenders.
It is a system response to domestic violence forging an intersectoral approach with formal protocols and responsibilities that are not centered or reliant on offender rehabilitation. The Duluth approach includes a high level of integration with the criminal justice system, particularly in terms of referrals of perpetrators to programs by police and the courts, and may feature mandatory arrest policies for police encountering domestic violence.
Many Australian intervention programs have been heavily influenced by the Duluth Model, offering a wide variety of integrated responses and programs. While most other Australian states and territories had some form of integrated program, and many had whole of government strategies or policy documents, in most cases the programs were only in operation in a small number of local areas. Well developed, well established state-wide programs, as opposed to isolated trial sites, appear to be much more the exception than the rule.
Both the ACT and Tasmanian integrated responses include both policy and operational elements. The ACT Family Violence Intervention Project FVIP has a policy, rather than legislative basis, and involves policing, prosecutions, the courts, corrective services, youth and family services, and victims of crime organisations.
The efforts are coordinated by a committee and chaired by the Victims of Crime Coordinator and it operates with a Duluth-style approach including pro-arrest policies, victim support, and perpetrator programs as a sentencing option. Tasmania has adopted a whole-of-government approach, with the Department of Justice responsible for implementation. Components include a 24 hour Family Violence Response and Referral Line, specialist domestic violence police teams and police prosecutors, and weekly case coordination meetings attended by relevant agencies concerning all active cases in each policing district.
In general, both the ACT and Tasmanian approaches are characterised by a high level of organisation and coordination between agencies, tied together by a wide-ranging policy approach. The ongoing evaluation of this program also highlights the extent to which the issue of domestic violence crosses social groups in Australia.
Rather than being an issue constrained to women in lower socioeconomic groups, reporting on referral rates at the two trial sites of Waverly and Orange demonstrates that women in more affluent areas are still at substantial risk from domestic violence:. The figures Of the eight women referred every day for being at serious risk of violence, two are at immediate risk of being killed In Orange, women were referred between September and February. One-third were at risk of being killed, a much higher proportion than at Waverley. The tool is used to identify the level of threat to the victim, allowing resources to be prioritised for victims for whom the threat is most serious.
The tool must be used by police responding to all instances of domestic violence. While integrated programs seem obvious from a public policy perspective, coordinating the many services that may be involved, potentially across local, state and the federal governments, has considerable challenges, possibly explaining the tentative moves towards integrated approaches in many states and territories. An important component of any intervention into domestic violence is to identify when violence is occurring.
While the integrated responses discussed above generally deal with domestic violence that has come to the attention of the police or criminal justice system, a large amount of domestic violence goes unreported. One way of identifying some of this unreported violence is through other services used by those at high risk.
The Australian Guidelines do not recommend a particular screening tool, however a recent review looked at screening tools for domestic violence that were designed for large-scale community screening programs in healthcare settings. The review examined four tools, all of which ranged from three to eight questions. Two instruments were designed to be administered by family doctors, one was designed for emergency departments, and one designed to be used with pregnant women.
The review concluded that good evidence showing the effectiveness of these screening tools was currently lacking. While many of the current screening tools are promising, more research with diverse populations is needed before they should be relied upon for screening programs. As an example of the otherwise undetected domestic violence that is identified by screening programs, the NSW Area Health Services have been undertaking routine screening of female clients for domestic violence from , and the Local Health Districts from Screening is undertaken with all women who attend antenatal and early childhood health services and women aged 16 and over who attend alcohol and other drug and mental health services.
The screening instrument is a relatively straightforward four questions asking the woman if they have been hit, slapped or hurt in other ways by their partner, if they are afraid of their partner, whether they are safe to go home, and whether they would like some assistance. The snapshot data for November revealed that 68 per cent of the approximately 22, women who attended a participating service were screened.
Just under 1, 6. In a discussion about domestic violence risk assessment tools, a report prepared for the Department of Justice in Canada states that they have strengths and limitations. The strengths include providing a common language among professionals, ensuring that services are allocated on the basis of need, removing the reliance on professional judgement, and allowing transparency and accountability for decision makers and the criminal justice system.
The limitations include the lack of professional standards for the application of the instruments, the lack of empirical research on the reliability, validity and accuracy of the scales, and the risk of false positives or false negatives, unnecessarily adding to fear of the offender, or underestimating the risk of violence. Those affected by domestic violence require a wide range of support services, including assistance to remove themselves and their children from a violent partner and maintain their safety in some instances. Many are at particular risk of violence, including lethal violence, when they attempt to leave a violent partner, so the availability of appropriate support services may literally be a matter of life and death.
There is little in the way of systematic reviews of support services for those affected by domestic violence and what research does exist tends to be from the United States. One of the reasons for the lack of evaluation is that support services are often not funded to undertake evaluations as well as service provision, and that the transient nature and safety concerns of the clients make evaluation challenging.
Even less research has been conducted on the appropriate support programs that should be provided specifically for same sex partners or men affected by domestic violence. Given that men are often reluctant to access community services more generally, it is likely that there are very specific challenges in this category.
A recent literature review on coordinated community responses to domestic violence, including shelters, advocacy and legal protection found a notable lack of research on the topic, and that there was little in the way of theory to guide the programs. Shelters for abused women are one of the key support services.
In addition to crisis accommodation, they often also provide telephone help lines, programs for children, transition housing services and outreach programs for abused women who are not staying at the shelter. A study of shelters in Ontario, Canada, found that shelters often offered these other services because no other service providers did, particularly in rural and remote areas. Funders and policy makers often had a poor grasp of the range of services that shelters provided, resulting in services being underfunded. The evaluations found that the programs tended to raise public awareness of the issues, but that more support and training for police was necessary to maximise the effectiveness of the programs.
Factors such as joint training between police and domestic violence workers, the need to gain the consent of the victim before involving other services, and having a range of services available to victims were considered to be important. However the review concluded that there was no clear evidence as to which of the various models generated the best outcomes for women. A recent Australian study looked at the experiences of victims of domestic violence supported through a 24 month police-led integrated domestic violence pilot program in Queensland.
However in follow-up interviews three months after the program the women reported substantial issues with securing accommodation for themselves and their children. Several women also reported ongoing abuse from their former partner, including stalking, physical and verbal abuse. The study highlights the importance, and difficulty, of these programs providing safe and sustainable housing arrangements, and the importance of these arrangements for their ongoing safety.
The intersection of domestic violence support services and homelessness services was highlighted by recent reforms to homelessness services in in NSW. The reforms were criticised for reducing the number of domestic violence shelters for women due to a greater emphasis on early intervention services.
As noted previously, conduct constituting domestic violence can encompass varying degrees of severity and take many forms—physical abuse, sexual abuse, damage to property, emotional abuse, social abuse, economic abuse, psychological abuse, and spiritual abuse. Whatever forms the violence takes, a central feature is that it involves a person exercising control and power by inducing fear, for example by using threatening behaviour. Some offences are covered by specific domestic or family violence laws, while other offences are covered by the relevant crimes legislation. The specific state and territory laws currently are:.
There are also a number of federal offences within the Commonwealth Criminal Code Act which could potentially give rise to a protection order in the context of domestic violence. For example, threatening behaviour or harassment that can form the basis for a protection order can also fall within the ambit of the federal offences which relate to using carriage services, such as mobile phones or computers, or postal services.
Another area of potential overlap is in relation to conduct constituting economic abuse. For example, coercing a family member to claim a social security payment is recognised as economic abuse amounting to domestic or family violence in some jurisdictions. Such behaviour could also constitute offences under social security legislation as well as the Criminal Code Act Cth relating to fraudulent conduct—such as obtaining a financial advantage by deception or making false or misleading statements in applications.
The parents need to identify themselves as parents and function together to coordinate their children's upbringing. Parents need to keep some information away from children such as information about their sexual relationship, or worrisome information such as the state of family finances, etc. Children ideally need to be allowed an age-appropriate amount of autonomy, but not allowed to have so much autonomy that they feel neglected or not also reigned in when that is necessary.
Most families decidedly don't manage to do all of this perfectly, but many do manage to pull off enough of these goals to make it work. Then there are the families where there are significantly non-ideal and problematic boundaries. The parents who fail to nurture their children, or who nurture them so much that the children feel smothered.
The parents who do not manage to keep their private business private; who sexualize their children before they are ready for that information, or who recruit children into adult confidant roles and confide their loneliness or anger towards the other spouse. The parents who divorce ungracefully and continue to fight after their divorce is complete, using their children as messengers.
There are many examples of how boundary problems within families can create significant pain for family participants. You already most likely know the term used to describe these families whose boundaries are seriously non-ideal. They are called "Dysfunctional Families". That popular term comes out of the Family Systems literature. I said above that boundaries have an ideal shape, and an ideal information filtering ability, but really, if you think about it, a boundary's shape is really a function of its ability to filter information properly.
A functional boundary that works to make family members healthy and happy by keeping information appropriately hidden or available will have a correct and more or less ideal shape.
Basic Civil Appellate Practice in the Court of Appeal for the Second District
When the boundary doesn't filter properly when all information passes through, or no information passes through , it will have a wrong shape too. Any given group's or individual's or sub-group's defining boundary can be evaluated based on how well and how situation-appropriately it filters information. Some information needs to be kept private, while other information needs to be shared. Deciding what to share and what to keep private is a moving target and a balancing act, however. It is easy to inadvertently share something you're not supposed to share, or to withhold something that would be better to share.
Good judgment is called for so that extremes of over-sharing, or under-sharing do not occur. Boundaries that chronically fail to keep people separated enough are typically described as "enmeshed", while boundaries that fail to keep people related enough are described as "detached". As a general rule, it is not a good thing to be too enmeshed or too detached. Family systems that can be characterized by consistently enmeshed or detached subsystems are likely to be Dysfunctional Families in the truest sense of that phrase.
Some examples of dysfunctional family systems will help to illustrate how over-enmeshment and over-detachment function and why it is problematic. Let's consider a common sort of scenario where two married partners with a child have marital problems. Perhaps one of the partners has had one or more sexual or emotional affairs outside the marriage, and this has not been disclosed to the other partner who only knows that something is wrong.
Here is an example of a relationship boundary that has become overly detached, meaning that the boundary around the couple is failing to continue to distinguish them as a couple; the boundary's filter closes down, important information is not shared, and appropriate privacy is not being maintained. Early on, the failure is unilateral, occurring in the mind of the straying partner more so than in the mind of the faithful partner, but since it takes two people to have a relationship, if one partner fails, the relationship ultimately must fail too.
Now, consider that the couple divorces and splits custody of their child. The partner who has been left is perhaps bitter, angry and humiliated about the experience, and feels a great internal pressure to have someone to vent this emotion towards. If that parent is able to maintain a healthy boundary as a parent, some other outlet other than the child will be chosen and the child will be spared that role of "shoulder to cry upon".
If the parent is overwhelmed and unable to keep the boundary between parent and child intact, then the child may be recruited as a confidant and exposed to a world of pain that he or she is not ready to process. This would be an example of enmeshment, where family members that should, for their own health, retain separate roles become instead fused together inappropriately and too much information is shared. Now, consider a further twist. Let's say that the two parents cease to want to talk to each other, and start to do their communicating through their child.
Every time the child transfers to a parent's house, he or she is told to tell the other parent a bunch of information. Even worse, each parent may start putting the other parent down in front of the child, in the process, loading the child up with conflicting duties and emotions. The child may even be inappropriately asked to choose one parent over the other. This sort of communication through a child is an example of Triangulation, which is a common shape suggesting unhealthy boundaries are present.
In this scenario, the child's emotional life is hijacked and invaded by his or her parent's unhealthy agendas, and the child suffers as a result. The Psychodynamic school of thought has a concept that makes sense to talk about here, known as "Introjection". Introjection can be said to be occurring when someone indoctrinates another person in a forceful or dogmatic manner, not allowing for any possibility of that other person choosing or not choosing to believe what is taught.
Introjection is an ultimate sort of boundary invasion. When someone has been introjected, it is like they have been colonized by an invading army. The person's "native" ideas are suppressed in favor of the introjected ideas. Introjected people are not always aware that they have been introjected, especially when this occurs at a young age. So — this is more or less how psychological boundary problems occur and what they might look like.
Therapists who are boundary-aware e. Their therapy will consist of an active effort to help reconfigure the family system so that boundary problems are resolved and restored to a more ideal shape. How can a normal person learn to identify when they are experiencing boundary problems within the groups and family systems they are a part of? There are several tell-tale signs you can look for. One is that you feel invaded or somehow trampled or disregarded by the actions of another person you're in a relationship with no matter how transient or informal that relationship might be.
If this is the case, you might do well to seek out Assertiveness Training assistance, as this sort of thing will help you re-establish the intactness of the boundary you draw around yourself. Another way to become aware of boundary problems is to look for points of unreasonable rigidity within your relationships. Giorge 15, Greece also highlighted this sense of new possibilities: The facilitator asked us to imagine our life in 10 years.
He envisions himself not just successful in the world of work, but also as relationally competent, happy and settled. He ascribes this to a sense of fresh hope that he had built in the group intervention context — a new optimism that a better future was possible for himself.
In addition to this focus on the distant future, children also reflected on the changes that they have been able to make in the present and near future, and how this will help them build towards a positive adulthood: Rosa Spain : Cos you express yourself, and you think about your future, your past and your present Ratcliffe et al. Leo very eloquently articulates how the integration of familial experiences into his sense of self enables the development of this more positive sense of his future: Leo : we did do a bit of activity where we did the tree of life… where you discuss your roots and then what your main things are, your trunks, and then your branches off and your fruits, your dreams and that.
Like almost any bright, capable teenager, Leo describes a sense of his future where his world is his oyster. This is rooted in a sense of his family where he is no longer doomed to repeat familial patterns, but is able to take strength from and learn from his history, and use it — even the broken and painful bits — to build a sense of his future. Limitations The study was limited by a number of factors.
Recommendations for Research and Practice The MPOWER group intervention offers some interesting variations from established manualised domestic violence and abuse interventions, which were valued by the CYP who were interviewed. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Arlington: American Psychological Association. Google Scholar. Braun, V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3 2 , 77— Bunston, W. Journal of Family Violence, 31 1 , 85— In plain sight : The evidence from children domestic abuse Research Report.
Callaghan, J. Retrieved from www. Accessed 8 June Subjectivity, 9 4 , — Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 21 4 , — Children and domestic violence: Emotional competencies in embodied and relational contexts. Psychology of Violence, 7 3 , — Journal of Child and Family Studies, 26 12 , — Campo, M. Children affected by domestic and family violence: review of domestic and family violence prevention, early intervention and response services. Cook, A. Complex trauma in children and adolescents.
Psychiatric Annals, 35 5 : — Cornelius, T. Primary and secondary prevention programs for dating violence: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12 3 , — Duhl, F. Learning space, and action in family therapy: A primer of sculpture. Seminars in Psychiatry, 5 2 , — Duncan, B.
- Account Options!
- Recent Online Trainings | The NCHERM Group?
- Bell Curve: Intelligence and Class Structure in American Life (A Free Press Paperbacks Book)!
Journal of Brief Therapy, 3 , 3— Fellin, L. Empowering young people who experienced domestic violence and abuse: the development of a group therapy intervention. Fergusson, D. Partner violence and mental health outcomes in a New Zealand birth cohort. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67 December , — Fujiwara, T. The impact of childhood abuse history, domestic violence and mental health symptoms on parenting behaviour among mothers in Japan. Child: Care, Health and Development, 38 4 , — Glodich, A. Adolescents exposed to violence and abuse : A review of the group therapy literature with an emphasis on preventing trauma reenactment.
Journal of Child and Adolescent Group Therapy, 8 3 , — Graham-Bermann, S. Violence exposure and traumatic stress symptoms as additional predictors of health problems in high-risk children. The Journal of Pediatrics, 3 , — Hartman, A. Finding families: An ecological approach to family assessment in adoption: A project craft publication. London: Sage. Howarth, E. Public Health Research, 4 10 , 1— Humphreys, C. Journal of Social Work, 6 1 , 53— Hunt, T.
Adverse childhood experiences and behavioral problems in middle childhood. Child Abuse and Neglect, 67 , — Jenney, A. Vine Eds. Waterloo: Wilfrid Laurier University Press. Katz, E. Lacasa, F. Emotion regulation and interpersonal group therapy for children and adolescents witnessing domestic violence: A preliminary uncontrolled trial. MacMillan, H. Public Health Research, 4 Masten, A. Resilience in development. In Oxford handbook of positive psychology pp. New York: Oxford University Press.
McFarlane, J. The intergenerational impact of intimate partner violence against mothers on child functioning over four years. Journal of Family Violence, 32 7 , — Meltzer, H. The mental health of children who witness domestic violence. Ncube, N. The tree of life project. Peled, E. Thousand Oaks: Sage. Perry, B.
- The Mystery of Genghis Khan: Books I and II.
- Press Releases.
- The Conversation.
- Régions et gouvernement central: Des contrats pour le développement régional (GOUVERNANCE) (French Edition)?
- CONEXÕES - A FORÇA E A FRAQUEZA (Portuguese Edition);
- Boundaries and Dysfunctional Family Systems?
Creative interventions with traumatized children. Surrey: Guilford Publications. Peterson, S. Early childhood relationships and the roots of resilience. In Encyclopedia on early childhood development pp. Ratcliffe, M. What is a sense of foreshortened future? A phenomenological study of trauma, trust, and time. Frontiers in Psychology, 5 September , 1— Roseby, V. A safe place to grow — A group treatment manual for children in conflicted, violent, and separating homes.
New York: The Haworth Press. Sharp, C. Accessed 3 June Siegel, J. Breaking the links in intergenerational violence: An emotional regulation perspective. Family Process, 52 2 , — Smith, E. Domestic abuse, recovering together. Stanley, N. Szymanski, K. A clinical perspective. Journal of Infant, Child, and Adolescent Psychotherapy, 10 1 , 51— Tjersland, O. A process study of group therapy with children who have been. Ungar, M. Community resilience for youth and families: Facilitative physical and social capital in contexts of adversity.
Children and Youth Services Review, 33 9 , — Vetere, A. Children who witness violence at home. Dowling Eds. London: Routledge. Walsh, F. Family resilience: A framework for clinical practice. Family Process, 42 I , 1— Strengthening family resilience. Guilford: Guilford Publications. White, M. Working with people who are suffering the consequences of multiple trauma: A narrative perspective. Narrative therapy with children and their families.
Adelaide: Dulwich Centre Publications. Wolpert, M. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 20 1 , 63— Wood, S.
Related The Family Domestic Violence Prevention Primer: How to Take the Dys Out of Functional
Copyright 2019 - All Right Reserved